Database Architect
- Time-series & relational database design
- Data governance, lineage, and audit frameworks
- Performance tuning and scaling at volume
- Reference data management and entity resolution
Independent, senior-led reviews — where you need an opinion, not an implementation.
Not every quant engagement is about building something new. Sometimes the question is simpler — and harder: can we rely on this model, this platform, or this hire? QuantDesigned provides independent, written assessments backed by hands-on technical review. Engagements are discrete, fixed-fee, and typically run two to six weeks.
Operational and manager risk is catalogued — and avoidable
5,000+ funds reviewed and 300+ operational-failure events catalogued — the kind of risk an independent review is built to catch. — Castle Hall (2017 white paper — illustrative base rate)
Independent advisory demonstrably moves fees and terms: Albourne advises on ~$800bn of alternatives; Aksia assesses ~$341bn. — Albourne / Aksia (as reported by the firms)
Three distinct engagements, each scoped as a discrete piece of work with defined deliverables.
Independent review of pricing, risk, valuation and signal-generation models — in-house, inherited or vendor-supplied. Suitable for second-line governance, pre-deployment sign-off, post-incident review and pre-acquisition diligence.
Technical and methodological DD on third-party quant platforms, data products and analytics vendors. Suitable for buy-vs-build decisions, investor or acquirer diligence, and allocator review of data-dependent managers.
Independent technical assessment of candidates, delivered through the QuantDesigned Learning Platform and reviewed by senior practitioners. Suitable for hiring panels lacking deep quant expertise, graduate intakes, senior hires and team build-outs.
We are always interested in connecting with strong practitioners across these disciplines — for permanent, fractional, and project work alike.